Home Tech Applications Noises Off: Breaking the exposure triangle paradigm with AI denoising

Noises Off: Breaking the exposure triangle paradigm with AI denoising

32

The ISO range of modern digital sensors has increased steadily, enabling faster shutter speeds for a given aperture. Eventually though, under dim conditions, even today’s sensors fail to gather sufficient light, leaving us with noisy images. However, just like the cavalry, a new image processing technology is riding over the hill to rescue these grainy photographs: AI denoising.

The exposure triangle

An early step on the journey to becoming a competent photographer is grasping the exposure triangle. Recognising the interdependence of aperture, shutter speed, and ISO is fundamental to achieving correct exposure. All three parameters have seen impressive advances in recent years. Thus, improvements in lenses, including aspherical and apochromatic designs, mean sharp images at wide apertures. Improvements in shutter technology, including electronic shutters, allow freezing of even high-speed motion.

The Empress Hotel in Victoria. Left original, right denoised. Leica Q2, 28mm f/1.7, 1/50s, ISO 3200
Crop of the image above: left original, right denoised

But perhaps the most significant change has been in the usability of higher and higher ISO ranges. For example, the Leica Q2 Monochrom has a maximum available ISO of 100,000. Despite these impressive numbers, eventually the laws of physics and paucity of photons win out. Under very low light, the ability to capture noise-free images becomes limited.

Photographers taking nighttime shots with a camera possessing modest or no in-body image stabilisation (IBIS) often resort to fast shutter speeds to avoid camera shake. Even with wide open apertures, for example f/1.7 on the Leica Q2, and a hand-held shutter speed of 1/50s, this can mean an ISO of 3200. You face a similar scenario if using a fast shutter speed to freeze motion without the help of bright daylight. Once exposure, shadows, and highlights have been adjusted in Lightroom, the resulting image can be noisy. This can manifest as graininess and/or colour distortion.

Chihuly Glass and Gardens, Seattle. Left original, right denoised. Leica Q2, 28mm, f/5.6, 1/50s, ISO 6400

AI denoising to the rescue

Are we stuck with the limited ‘correct exposure space’ defined by the interdependence and physics-based boundaries of each parameter in the exposure triangle? It seems not.

Those of you who use Lightroom to process your RAW images might have noticed a new feature. Several months ago, a new ‘denoise’ option appeared under the ‘Edit’ panel. As the name suggests, this offers users a means of removing noise from their images. The technology underlying this new feature is artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, machine learning.

I recently began using this feature, and in this article would like to share my perspectives on its effectiveness. I am also sharing ‘before’ and ‘after’ examples of images to which I applied it. Other image processing platforms also offer denoising capabilities, but I have no direct experience of them. If you do, feel free to share your impressions in the comments section.

Fish throwing, Pike Place Public Market, Seattle. Left original, right denoised. Leica Q2, 28mm, f/2.8, 1/3200s, ISO 6400

Deep learning

Firstly, a few words about how these denoising algorithms work. Here is an overview from the Adobe team that built the Lightroom denoising app. And here is an overview from Nvidia, who produce the chips powering the graphics processing units (GPUs) used in the training of machine learning models.

Briefly, the deep learning models underlying these denoising apps were trained on huge numbers of image pairs, one noisy and the other not. The machine learning algorithms learned what non-noisy versions of noisy images should look like and can therefore create a new, ‘noise-free’ image. 

The algorithms do not understand the images in the way humans do. They operate at the level of pixel patterns. Nevertheless, they ‘know’ what a collection of pixels corresponding to a denoised image should look like, and can therefore create one.

Cardero’s, Coal Harbour, Vancouver. Left original, right denoised. Leica Q2, 28mm, f/1.7, 1/250s, ISO 5000

Heavenly bodies

This image enhancement technology is related to methodology used in the world of astronomy. In that case, scientists used it to create clear images of celestial bodies from highly pixelated images captured as unmanned spacecraft hurtle past planets, moons, and asteroids. What was once only available to the boffins at NASA is now available on your home computer.

The denoising is conducted on your device using the installed GPU. The algorithms have been optimised for the typical GPUs installed on commonly used desktop and laptop computers. I run Lightroom on a MacBook Air with an M1 chip and 8 Gb RAM. The 8-core GPU is integrated into the system-on-a-chip (SoC) design of the processor. Denoising a full frame 85 Mb DNG from my Leica Q2 takes around 2 minutes.

Sachiko Reiners, Coronado Public Library. Left original, right denoised. Leica M240 and 75mm Summarit f/2.4, at f/4, 1/125s, ISO 2500

The use of this new denoise feature therefore adds significant additional time to the post-processing workflow. Is it worth it?

AI denoising is worth the additional effort

In my opinion, the answer is a resounding ‘yes!’.

The results achieved using denoise are extremely impressive. Unfortunately, the compression routines used to create lower resolution images for posting in this article might conceal its true impact. To my eye, when looking at 2 Mb images, the effect is astonishing. I have included several pairs of aggressive crops in an effort to make it as clear as possible.

Whitney Shay, Coronado Public Library. Left, original, right denoised. Leica M240 and Summilux 35mm, f/3.4, 1/250s, ISO 1600
Crop of the image above

Is this cheating? Is it using AI in a sneaky way to fool the viewer of the photograph?

In my opinion, the answer is a resounding ‘no!’.  

These systems represent the latest technological advance in photography, just as superior lenses, superior shutters, and superior ISO range have expanded the creative space available to photographers.

I look forward to further developments in denoising technology, as deep learning algorithms become even more sophisticated and GPUs become even faster. Meanwhile, I will be cranking up my shutter speed and my ISO with abandon.

Read more from the author


Want to contribute an article to Macfilos? It’s easy. Just click the “Write for Us” button. We’ll help with the writing and guide you through the process.


32 COMMENTS

  1. Many thanks for the article. I think there’s no doubt AI Denoise software not only cleans up high ISO files but also extends the life of older cameras with less sophisticated sensors.

    I’m using PR3 as needed but my frustration is that once I use it, it won’t let me store my processed files with all my other files. It puts the PR3 files into a separate folder and I see no way of preventing that. Anyone else find this frustrating? Anyone have a solution for this?

    As a consequence and for simple convenience it’s easier to use LR denoise software.

    • Thank you Le. Yes, I have used the LR denoise feature on images from a three year-old Q2 and a ten year-old M240, and it works well in both cases. All the best, Keith

  2. Thanks for this well illustrated overview of the subject. It is also reassuring to learn that AI can increase the creative space available to us. I mostly use Topaz De-noise as Photoshop plug in. I find it very customisable with options for sharpening etc included in the De-noise process. But now it’s available I also use the facility in Lightroom

    • Thank you Gerald. There have been so many mentions of Topaz in the comments that I think I should look into that option, especially if it is also able to handle images generated on dedicated monochrom sensors. All the best, Keith

  3. Dear Keith,
    these are stunning results and they lift low light images to a new level. In fact, I will have to go over some old images with a lot of noise, especially the ones with banding of the Q at ISO 6400.
    Furthermore, this strogly asks for a newer graphics card on my home computer to accelarate the process.
    I’m sure there is more to come from Adobe and Topaz Lab.
    Thanks for the article and the well done demonstration of that new feature.
    Greets Dirk

    • Many thanks Dirk! I wonder if anyone has tried the LR denoise routine running on the new Mac Studio. I would be very interested to hear what the processing time is for a 47 megapixel image on one of those puppies! Cheers, Keith

          • I’ve checked the time duration on my home computer (12y old, graphics card is newer) and in the office (Ryzen CPU and some AMD RX graphics) using the task manager. The calculation is done on the graphics system, if a new one is available. That’s were significant time is saved. As always, CPU, GPU, tons of RAM and a fast, large SSD speed everything up.
            Greets Dirk

      • I run it on Mac Studio with M2 processor, basic configuration. De-noising is a matter of seconds. I have not used it for older files yet. But results from recent cameras are impressive. However, I found it important not to push it too far. Better some noise than an artificial looking result. But then again, I also like the grain of a Tri-X…. Thanks for this great article, Keith. It’s one of these “for future reference” pieces! JP

        • Thanks Joerg-Peter, I have learned a lot from the many comments received. For example, for the price of some used Leica lenses, I could buy a new Apple Studio Max and Studio Display, which would greatly enhance my post-processing workflow in this new, AI-enabled world. I shall be giving that some serious consideration! Cheers, Keith

          • As Jörg-Peter knows, I also bought an Apple Studio M2 a couple of months ago and am absolutely delighted with it. I had heard worrying remarks about noise, but they appear to be based on the original M1 Studio. The M2 is totally silent (as far as I can hear…) and it is much more practical than my previous Mac mini which was somewhat lacking in ports. The M2 Studio has a front SD-card slot, very useful for photographers, and two front USB sockets (plus a further of ports collection at the rear). It is also extremely fast. Both J-R and I went for the spec which is still very capable and, I think, enough for me.

            A couple of years ago, I bought the Mac Studio display, which is also an excellent choice. I have rigged up an older LG Apple-centric display, so I have a very useful two-screen set up. I find this invaluable when editing blog posts and moving pictures, WordPress and reference panes around.

  4. Some impressive results, especially in the color images above but, to be honest, I don’t remember the last time I felt the need to process noise out of my pictures. I actually prefer a bit of noise than totally clean files, and I would certainly not have bothered processing the above b&w files.

    • Hi Fiatlux. Many thanks. I agree that B&W images often have more character with a little graininess, but I also like the way the smooth, shiny varnish on pianos looks better without the grain! Cheers, Keith

  5. I have used DXO PureRAW 2 as a plug-in to Lightroom for about 18 months now. I had to buy the new version as the original version processed Leica Q2 files, but for some reason wouldn’t process SL2 files. You have three options High Quality, PRIME, or DeepPRIME. DeepPRIME uses AI technology and takes longest to process, about 1 to 2 minutes depending on the image details. A few times I have found the DeepPRIME results a bit over the top on facial features, turning the skin to a wax like texture. I therefore tend to use PRIME as my default and only if I want to push it further do I try DeepPRIME. In most cases the results are truly impressive, but the DNG file sizes are brutal. An already large SL2 file is typically 85MB, the DXO file is 190MB. I only apply it to images I want to print.

    • Hi Tom, agreed, the denoise files are enormous! Having experimented with this process, I am developing a better sense of when it’s worth gobbling up (and paying for) yet more storage space. Cheers, Keith

  6. When this came out I tried it on my noisiest camera, a Nikon D2X. Iso1600 looked better than iso400 untreated. Tried it on iso3200 and it was horrible. So it’s breathed new life into some of my old gear.
    I have yet to see if it’ll clean up the banding on my M240 at 3200 and over.

    • Hi, just tried it on my M240 and it cleans up both the noise and banding at iso3200 but not at iso6400 which is still unusable to my eyes.
      However it did clean up my SL(typ 601) at iso 6400 to the degree that I would consider that a usable setting now.
      Quite impressive. Mark

  7. The denoise AI applications can be quite beneficial on scanned negative images in reducing the impact of grain. I have found Topaz Denoise AI and Photo AI both can help. It seems that film grain is treated much like noise depending upon the settings you use.

    • My experience is not so positive with scanned images and noise reduction, be it LR or Topaz or DXO. The grain is accentuated instead of removed (Agfachrome 100 asa and Fujichrome Velvia 50 asa slide film).
      Donald

      • Hi Ed, thanks for the tip regarding ON1 No Noise. As mentioned in another comment, it could be that the LR denoise feature is not currently compatible with B&W images. I plan to investigate. Cheers, Keith

  8. Yes, LR AI Denoise is impressive. For M10M images (I do not have an M11M), ON1 NoNoise AI 2023 will do similar marvelous things.

    I only expect such apps will get rapidly more sophisticated and useful – to a point. 35mm equivalent sensors are, IMO, more or less limited to around 60 MP with the present Bayer array, due to diffraction limiting. With a full frame 35mm sensor of let’s say 50 MP, the diffraction limit is f/6.4, for 100 MP it is f/4.6, and for 275 MP it is f/2.8! (Please note that this is for a green light wavelength, and the pixels in the current Bayer array – perhaps some new pixel architecture might change these numbers.) The upshot is that even something like Leica’s APO-Summicron ASPH 50/2, which is so well corrected wide open, would show little improvement at these higher sensor pixel sizes if closed down to medium apertures, and imaging might then deteriorate. “Fine” you may say, “let’s use it wide open”. Less SOTA lenses may not show maximum resolution until, let’s say, f/5.6, and if a camera system’s sensor maxes out at f/4, one could close the lens down but not get its maximum performance, at least as I understand it, before performance starts to fall off. So there are likely diminishing returns in much larger full frame 35mm sensors perhaps beyond 60MP. We will see.

    But even if there is a way around this, you need enough photons to make an image, and eventually it is so dark that you run out of them! But we are not at that limit yet. Enjoy! I do.

  9. Very well presented. An additional benefit of AI Denoise (and it extends to Topaz Denoise AI also in my experience) it you can jettison your tripod for many low light images or images where you need a high ISO to allow for a small aperture. Simply shoot at higher ISOs and denoise the image. I have noticed that my M10 Monochrom DNGs are not compatible with Lightroom’s denoise function, even converted to TIF or jpeg. Anyone else experience the same issue?

    • Same issue with my M11M. I wish Adobe could address this with an Update but, to be fair, it is less of a concern with a Monochrom camera. The lack of colour noise translates in a largely superior high ISO performance and the feature is much less needed.

    • I read somewhere else that the denoise software requires the RGB channels to interpret and process the image. In a Monochrome file there are no RGB channels per se, even though the file still has a DNG format.

      • Hi Tom, thanks for clarifying this. The B&W examples I included were converted from color images after denoising. I have a Q2 Monochrom, but have not attempted the denoise routine on any images generated with it – its high ISO performance is of course stellar. Nevertheless, I will give it a try and see what I find. Cheers, Keith

    • Thank you Bill. I rarely carry or use a tripod, unless I am using a telephoto lens in low light, and so with this denoise software I am now even more confident in taking fast shutter speed, high ISO shots in dim conditions. Cheers, Keith

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here